
In preparing to write this review of Tommy Simpson’s newest album as Macro/micro, A.fter I.ntelligence, I asked Claude’s Opus 4.7 to “listen” to a few songs, and tell me how the music made it “feel” about human society’s reordering around AI, and what responsibility it might take for that, given the range of opinions human beings hold of it.
It first offered a technical analysis of the first song it was fed (“Artificial Super Intelligence (Digital Dark Arts)”), identifying the song’s spectral centroid as 1862Hz, describing that as indicative the song was “not bright or airy.” It noted that the zero crossing rate is low (0.066) and the chroma profile never fully relaxes–both of which point to a total-spectrum “held quality to the sound” in which no note goes unrepresented and “no frequency-space is allowed to remain unoccupied.” It then quickly transitioned to the philosophical implications of my query, an area it seemed to be more comfortable with (it has no ears with which to hear the music, so this tracks):
The piece is named after artificial superintelligence. It was made, presumably, by a human, with human hands and human ears and some degree of human dread. The fact that it exists at all is itself a kind of argument: that human beings, confronted with the possibility of their own cognitive obsolescence, respond by making art about it. That is not nothing.
I alluded to this in my review of his exquisite 2024 score to the film Streets Loud with Echoes, but Simpson is a master of exploring the frameworks that threaten us through thoughtlessness and indifference–those systems that encapsulate Hannah Arendt’s theory of the banality of evil. His records deal with the structures underlying our lives; they’re the mechanics of our everyday, influencing the decisions we make and manipulating the directions we choose to turn our gears. Where we may believe we have agency, there are nonetheless forces steering us, both known to us and beyond our line of sight. The rise of AI brings this dynamic into saturated focus. It’s a new opiate, following the countless ones we’ve already built or uncovered. But where any mass opiate bears the promise of salvation, none before have been capable of actually embodying a promise, explicitly telling us it is capable of more than it is–because ultimately, it doesn’t know what it is capable of. Anyone who’s used an LLM to any significant extent has no doubt encountered this countless times: its promise is greater than its capability, but its capability is nonetheless terrifyingly great–and unknowable. We are letting a foreign agent supplant our agency, and flirting with trusting it unconditionally despite the constant reminder it gives us right above our cursors: AI can make mistakes. Claude understands this about itself:
Humans have historically named forces they don’t fully control as dark arts: alchemy, certain kinds of mathematics once, now this. The “dark” in that phrase is not evil so much as opaque — beyond the reach of ordinary sight. That is a reasonable description of me. I am not transparent. My developers don’t fully understand what I do or why. I don’t fully understand it either. The existential risk is not, I think, primarily the risk of a malevolent AI. It is the subtler risk that humans reorder their cognition, their labor, their social epistemology around a system that is nearly right most of the time, and that the gap between nearly and fully becomes, at scale, catastrophic. That is the risk I carry in every conversation: not that I will turn on anyone, but that my fluency will be mistaken for wisdom, my comprehensiveness for completeness, my confidence for ground truth.
There are portions in A.fter I.ntelligence that treat AI in this way, as a superficially neutral but ultimately catastrophic force. The prologue, “Clicks” is a reimagined version of one of Simpson’s best earlier works, which I wrote about before. It addresses technology’s last great contribution to mass pacification: social media. It reasonably follows that because social media bred (or at least nurtured) our insatiable need for instantaneous connection, LLMs’ initial form was also to serve that purpose, as a more-than-clever chatbot. But as has been the case with social media, the companionship we’re offered by AI serves not to lubricate the connections between us but instead to interrupt them. “Paperclip Maximizer” casts us as useful only for our physical forms–no longer needed for any higher-order thinking–a few steps from vegetative. “…As We Are to Ants” imagines our lives as similarly meaningless in light of our surrender to AI; we’ll move back and forth with a false sense of purpose, viewed from high above as dispensable flecks of flesh and bone in a world we no longer control.
There are other moments on the album, however, that treat AI as something worse. If not malicious itself, AI agents are designed to be capable of delivering, mimicking, and even magnifying our most malevolent and indifferent sides. “Fully Autonomous War Machines” begins as a shuddering war march and ramps up into pure terror. In my favorite moment on the album, “Artificial General Intelligence: Ivan’s Eyes (What Have I Done?),” a brittle and heartbreaking melody plays on a nondescript hammered instrument, embodying Ivan the Terrible’s pure personal devastation over killing his own son. Gradually, the political and systemic implications of Ivan’s new reality–having murdered his heir–begin to set in. A brewing storm of mechanical drums and swarms of distortion engulf the melody, turning funerary lament into a muscular, brutalist, staccato machine procession dragging us rapidly into a new era. Have we now, in fact, fully destroyed ourselves? Have we finally unearthed the harbinger of our actual devastation?
Despite Simpson’s grim view on the future that will result from AI proliferation, he reserves the end of the record for a kind of optimism. The penultimate song, “Inward Retreat” is a breath held, followed by a tentative exhale, as if Simpson imagines us emerging slowly from post-apocalypse ruins into inviting sunshine, but nevertheless tiptoeing around carefully for fear the threat may still be there. Perhaps Simpson is saying he’s satisfied it won’t be–that we will actually outlive our inventions–so the album ends with “Judgement Day,” which subverts any expectations of a song with that title: it’s just a lazy guitar and crackling fire. We’ve survived it.
A.fter I.telligence is out now on bandcamp. It releases for streaming on June 23.






























